Johnson v. Glick (1973) is used to determine if an officer's conduct 'shocks the conscience' and violates constitutional rights. Which outcome does this case address?

Johnson v. Glick (1973) is used to determine if an officer's conduct 'shocks the conscience' and violates constitutional rights. Which outcome does this case address?

• A. Excessive force
• B. Search and seizure
• C. Probable cause for arrest
• D. First Amendment rights

Answer: (A)

The main idea is whether an officer’s use of force against a detainee can violate due process by shocking the conscience. Johnson v. Glick addresses excessive force by jail or police personnel against pretrial detainees, and it uses the idea that conduct that “shocks the conscience” can amount to a constitutional violation under civil rights laws. This case focuses on whether the force used was more than necessary to maintain order and safety, and thus unconstitutional. It’s not about unlawful searches and seizures, lack of probable cause for arrest, or First Amendment rights—the distinctions belong to different constitutional protections.

The main idea is whether an officer’s use of force against a detainee can violate due process by shocking the conscience. Johnson v. Glick addresses excessive force by jail or police personnel against pretrial detainees, and it uses the idea that conduct that “shocks the conscience” can amount to a constitutional violation under civil rights laws. This case focuses on whether the force used was more than necessary to maintain order and safety, and thus unconstitutional. It’s not about unlawful searches and seizures, lack of probable cause for arrest, or First Amendment rights—the distinctions belong to different constitutional protections.